Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ji Sung Nam vs Evan Song Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nam vs Song analysis and find out who is favored!
Ji Sung Nam vs Evan Song Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nam 1 - 0 Song
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nam has won 46.09% of points on their second serve, while Song has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nam, in recent form, has won 50.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Song has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.64% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nam has saved 56.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Song has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nam has won 50% of matches played (W/L 15/ 15), with Song winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 232/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Song has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 19/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13), where as Song has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nam winning 1 times and Song being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nam winning 2 and Song winning 0. The last match between Nam and Song was at the Drummondville Challenger, 19-02-2020, Second, I.hard with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nam and Song have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nam winning 0 times and Song 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nam winning 0, and Song 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nam has played against opponents with an average rank of 311.37 while Song has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nam has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Song has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nam has converted 40.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Song has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
663
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
314
High
32
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
57% (280-215)
Career Total W/L
52% (219-203)
50% (6-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,445
Career Prize Money
$7,140
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ji Sung Nam vs Evan Song For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nam VS Song
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Ji Sung Nam | Evan Song |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:56:12 | 0:56:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (22/42) | 55% (28/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (19/22) | 50% (14/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 43% (10/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (27/51) | 29% (12/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Evan Song
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ji Sung Nam | Evan Song |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (13/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (126/138) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 199.25 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (484/842) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (334/484) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (165/358) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (35/86) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (345/870) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ji Sung Nam
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Kaito Uesugi
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Yunseong Chung
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Song Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Evan Song
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Evan Song
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Duckhee Lee
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Evan Song
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Evan Song
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
81 of
105)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Evan Song
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Evan Song
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
Dennis Novikov
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Song
Player
James Hopper
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nam Vs Song Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nam are available here and Song photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
